Sexual desires of either the child or the person. (a) A person commits the offense of child molestation when he or sheĭoes any immoral or indecent act to or in the presence of or with anyĬhild under the age of 16 years with the intent to arouse or satisfy the Child molestation aggravated child molestation. In Georgia, that crime is a narrowly defined sex crime:ġ6-6-4. They have been charged with cruelty to children, reckless conduct and tattooing without a license, not child molestation. This one did and it will have repercussion on both the child’s self image and his/her ability to interact in society. You suggest are focused on the sexual abuse component of the definition. The first term of that definition is easily met in this case. Abuse takes many forms and some of them don’t leave physical marks nor are they sexual in nature. People now read “molestation” and they think “pedophile”. Molestation in this country is a oft abused definition because of shows like “To Catch A Predator”. Any prosecutor worth a dime can portray tattooing a minor, their child or not, as molestation by that definition. Permanently marking a child can result in both disturbance and injurious effect as the child enters public life and ages. What evils are we actually capable of stopping? How can we fail to challenge an outrageous cultural norm as disfiguring and intrusive as circumcision? It is little wonder that this same society breeds proselytizing creationists, civilian and military torture systems, staggering entitlement ponzi schemes, warmongering imperialism, and boundless corruption perpetrated under the guise of governance.
![judicial consent for minor to get tatoo judicial consent for minor to get tatoo](https://www.inkedmag.com/.image/ar_4:3%2Cc_fill%2Ccs_srgb%2Cfl_progressive%2Cq_auto:good%2Cw_1200/MTU5MDMyNDQ4MzU3NTA4ODg4/tattoo-kid-larry-ray-jackson.jpg)
Reflecting on the failure of society in the United States to protect newborns from rites born from superstition and sexual puritanism shows how controlled we are. Government shields parents and the practitioners who buy into religious, cultural, or health propaganda from this system rather than protecting the victims of it.
![judicial consent for minor to get tatoo judicial consent for minor to get tatoo](https://i2.wp.com/eforms.com/images/2017/08/MP-2.png)
Instead, government permits, promotes, and protects the institutions that exist only to profit from these mutilations. These individuals have no opportunity to consent to this needless procedure, nor to stand up for the sanctity of their bodies or even rely on government to do so! Millions of infant boys are painfully, permanently and irrevocably mutilated every year by circumcision, now approximately 56% of newborn males in the United States. Parents do not own the bodies of their children. Not sure what I can do at this time but I am very sad for my 16 year old down the road.
#Judicial consent for minor to get tatoo skin#
I have to say after being a mother who has suffered knowing this permanent skin damage and worry of demeaning and cruel comments to my 16 year old. My ex and my 26 year old says they did not break the law because they crossed the state line this is okay? Your thoughts on this reasoning? If there not a contributory to the delinquency of a minor or cruelty to children type of protection here? This is a permanent disfigurement. If the law states no tattoos in your state under age I think the law should be enforced. One I was not asked by either party (as the biological mother), Two the tattoo says “Forever a Piece of Me” which I think could get taunting, demeaning and cruel remarks from teenage boys and girls saying things like ” I will take forever a piece of you” or Do you want forever a piece of me”, etc. My exhusband and oldest daughter age 26 took my minor daughter age 16 over the Georgia state line because it is illegal in Georgia under age 18 to Alabama where it is legal at age 16 with parental consent to get a tatoo.
![judicial consent for minor to get tatoo judicial consent for minor to get tatoo](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/62/44/28/624428880eb7aacc7062785cf4bf2139.jpg)
They have been charged with cruelty to children, reckless conduct and tattooing without a license. The couple insists that they did not know it was illegal and only gave into the demands of the kids that they wanted small cross tattoos like their own. In Georgia, it is illegal to give tattoos to children under 18 and it is illegal to give tattoos to anyone without a license. She was not pleased and called child welfare. The tattoos were spotted by their biological mother when they returned home (much like the earlier Fresno case). The ten year old was spared the experience. The parents borrowed a tattoo machine from a friend and used a needle made from guitar strings to give six of their seven children tattoos after Thanksgiving. Now in Georgia, parents Patty Jo Marsh and her husband, Jacob Bartels have been arrested for giving their children tattoos using a home-made tattoo device. We previously saw the prosecution of a California father who gave his son a gang tattoo, here.